Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Positions 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A good., Montoya, An excellent. K., and you will Jiang, L. (2017). What makes Particular Stem industries Far more Gender Balanced As opposed to others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–35. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and Hudson, L. (2013). Brand new Stereotypical Desktop Scientist: Gendered media Representations because the a buffer so you’re able to Inclusion for females. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Spots 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Age., and you may Lo, L. (2013). Do gender-research Stereotypes Expect Science Identity and you may Research Profession Ambitions Certainly Student Research Discipline? Soc. Psychol. Educ. sixteen (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende within the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und auch Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Youngsters in math, pc technology, science and you can techology (STEM) areas . Retrieved away from

Diekman, A great. B., Steinberg, M., Brownish, E. R., Belanger, An effective. L., and you may Clark, Age. K. (2017). A target Congruity Make of Part Entryway, Wedding, and you may Get-off: Wisdom Communal Mission Techniques inside the Stem Gender Holes. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, An excellent. H., and Karau, S. J. (2002). Character Congruity Concept out-of Bias on the Female Frontrunners. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.step three.573

Eagly, An effective. H., and Timber, W. (2012). “Social Role Theory,” into the Handbook out of Concepts from Personal Psychology, Frequency II. Editors P. van Lange, An effective. Kruglanski, and you will Age. Higgins (Los angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, A beneficial. A beneficial., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., and West, K. (2020). Just how Gender and you can Battle Stereotypes Change the Continuing growth of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Feedback of Physics and you can Biology Blog post-Doctoral Applicants. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Trip, Letter. M., Hyde, J. S., and you will Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-federal Patterns of Gender Variations in Math: Good Meta-Research. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equivalence Bureau Cabinet Office (2017). Gender Equality Light Papers (Sum Model. Tokyo, Japan: White papers on gender equality 2017 . Recovered of

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A beneficial., and you can Brooks, A. W. (2015)pared to Guys, Feminine Examine Elite group Development because Similarly Possible, but Less Fashionable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A beneficial. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Grey, J. Good., and you can McN). This new Neuropsychology out-of Nervousness: An enquiry with the Services of one’s friend System. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Greenwald, An effective. G., McGhee, D. Age., and you can Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Knowledge: This new Implicit Relationship Take to. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.six.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and Lee, C. Yards. (2003). Evaluating the new Authenticity away from Mind Construal Scales. Humm Res 29 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, Yards. Age., and Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Complement Structure. Classification Processes. Intergroup Relations 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, A., Kano, K., Minamizaki, A good., McKay, Elizabeth., and you may Yokoyama, H. M. (2019). Parental Egalitarian Thinking toward Gender Spots Connect with Contract towards the Girls Providing Stem industries from the college or university for the The japanese. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, An excellent., Kano, K., Inoue, A., McKay, Age., and you can Yokoyama, H. Meters. (2020). Gender-biased Societal Impression off Base fields, Targeting the fresh new Determine off Egalitarian Perceptions to your Gender Roles. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/2.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, G., Dukala, K., and you will Szastok, M. (2020). The brand new Base Graduate: Just after Graduation, Group Already Differ for the Employment Outcomes, Attributions to achieve your goals, and you may Wished Job Attributes. J. Soc. Circumstances 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, Yards. kissbrides.com superb website to read (2016). Social Differences in Survey Reacting: Things and you may Insights in the Examination of Response Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386